Why do we sing at a lower pitch? by Jan R. Luthby Jan R. Luth |Het ORGEL |Year 97 |(2001) |Issue 6
Het ORGEL 97 (2001), nr. 6, 22-24 [summary]
Many Dutch church musicians experience that congregations have trouble singinghigh tones like d2. Is this a new development? And if so, how canwe explain it?
Writings of Van Blankenburg (1745), Kist (1840) and Van der Dussen (1848) indicate thatcongregations formerly sang both higher and lower than they do today. Chorale books in the18th and 19th centuries have the hymns and psalms notated at the same pitch as, or at ahigher one than, comparable present-day books. Important sources are: Witvogel (1730),Stechwey (1770), Michelet (1771), Potholt (1777), Van Eem (1780), Ruppe (1806), Hauff(1837), Bastiaans (1852), Worp (1892).
Organs often had a different pitch from a1= 440 Hz: Grote Kerk Alkmaar (415Hz), Westerkerk Amsterdam (460), Oude Kerk Amsterdam (465), Pieterskerk Leiden,Stevenskerk Nijmegen, St.-Maartenskerk Zaltbommel (all three 415), Bovenkerk Kampen (g#1= 435 Hz). But organists who played high-pitched organs did not always choose melodiesnotated at a lower pitch.
So indeed we sing lower than our ancestors did. An explanation might be the lack ofsinging education and of the urge to sing at all. In the 19th century, an average studentsang as much in one day as an adult churchgoer now does in a month.